But there I go. Interviewing people. Experts in ox-driving.
It always comes back to haunt me.
In the "Polar Vortex" last week, I got a lot of writing and editing of interviews done, including spending a little time with this passage in Brandt Ainsworth's interview from last year:
I drive with a goad, but I like a lash and I respect people who are good with a lash. It’s kind of like a head yoke to me: I’ve always had an interest in that and I’ve wanted to develop that skill. The reason I started with a goad was that it was simpler, and I know it was Howie Van Ord that told me, traditionally people who work in the woods use a goad stick, . . . I can definitely see the advantages of a lash, but you have to develop that skill, too. I really believe in - whether it’s a goad or a lash - being very accurate with where you touch them. I think if you’re very accurate and well-timed, you need very little force.
I don’t know if you saw today, but driving that team, they were turning, they were not behaving. I think the near ox, Pollux, was being bad, and I got him at the perfect time right on the neck where I intended to, just a little rap, a flick of the wrist, but it got his attention at the perfect time and I hit him exactly where I wanted to - kind of behind the ears and the head of the yoke - and he turned and I had their attention. I think whichever you use, you should kind of have that accuracy. I think if I switched to a lash it would take me months to develop that accuracy and I’d be pretty frustrated. . .
Long story short, my lash work wasn't getting it done. Thinking of that interview excerpt, I switched over to a goad, shut my mouth, and concentrated on being accurate with the commands.
Things improved.
The moral of the story: Never ask anyone anything. You'll never confront the moments where you're coming up short. You'll never be burdened with having to improve.
There's a reason they call it "blissful ignorance."
Or maybe. . .
Or maybe. . .
No comments:
Post a Comment